- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10 and Case T-440/12: Order of the General Court of 25 November 2014 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission (Actions for annulment — Competition — Cartels — European prestressing steel market — Price fixing, market sharing and exchange of sensitive commercial information — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Decision amending the initial decision without affecting the fines imposed on the applicant — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Partial manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TB0426
62010TB0426
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/30
(Joined Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10 and Case T-440/12) (*)
(Actions for annulment - Competition - Cartels - European prestressing steel market - Price fixing, market sharing and exchange of sensitive commercial information - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Decision amending the initial decision without affecting the fines imposed on the applicant - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Partial manifest inadmissibility)
(2015/C 073/40)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA (Gijón, Spain) (represented by: in Cases T-426/10 and T-575/10, F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, and, in Case T-440/12, initially F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, then F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and V. Bottka, and, in Case T-440/12, C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents, and in Cases T-426/10 and T-440/12, by L. Ortiz Blanco, lawyer)
Re:
Applications for annulment and alteration of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and by Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011, and by the letter COMP/G2/DVE/nvz/79465 from the Commission’s Director-General for Competition of 25 July 2012.
Operative part of the order
1.In Case T-426/10, the form of order seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.
2.In Case T-575/10, the action is rejected as manifestly inadmissible.
3.The remainder of the pleas in law and forms of order sought is reserved.
4.Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA is ordered to pay the costs relating to the pleas in law and forms of order directed against Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 amending Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel) made in Case T-426/10 and the costs in Case T-575/10.
(*) Language of the case: Spanish.
(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.