I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-534/12)
2013/C 32/39
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Still GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by S. Waller, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 September 2012 in Case R 130/2012-1;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs;
—Join the case under Article 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court with the action brought in parallel against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in Case R 4/2012-1, also of 10 September 2012, regarding the Community trade mark application ‘Truck Data Services’, application No 009931429.
Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the word elements ‘Fleet Data Services’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 35, 36, 37 and 39 — Community trade mark application No 9 931 387
Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
—Infringement of the second sentence of Article [75] of Regulation No 207/2009