I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-295/11)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Application for the Community figurative mark duschy - Earlier Community figurative mark DUSCHO Harmony - Relative ground for refusal - Absence of likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009)
2012/C 319/14
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Duscholux Ibérica, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonnel Callicó, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Duschprodukter i Skandinavien AB (Hisings Backa, Sweden) (represented initially by M. Jonson, and subsequently by A. Kyhlhammar, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 March 2011 (Case R 662/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Duscholux Ibérica, SA and Duschprodukter i Skandinavien AB
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Duscholux Ibérica, SA to pay the costs, including those incurred by Duschprodukter i Skandinavien AB in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.