EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-382/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2024 – European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (Appeal – Intellectual property – Community designs – Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) – Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights – Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property – Article 4 – Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Article 41 – Application for registration of a Community design – Right of priority – Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT – Time period – Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention – Limits)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0382

62021CA0382

February 27, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2024/2566

22.4.2024

(Case C-382/21 P)

(Appeal - Intellectual property - Community designs - Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) - Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights - Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property - Article 4 - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 41 - Application for registration of a Community design - Right of priority - Priority claim based on an international application filed under the PCT - Time period - Interpretation consistent with Article 4 of that convention - Limits)

(C/2024/2566)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Gája, D. Hanf, E. Markakis and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR (represented by: J. Hellmann-Cordner, Rechtsanwältin, and by T. Lachmann and F. Steinbach, Patentanwälte)

Intervener in support of the appellant: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, J. Samnadda and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 April 2021, The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann v EUIPO (Gymnastic and sports apparatus and equipment) (T-579/19, EU:T:2021:186), in so far as it upholds the second part of the second plea in law in the action at first instance and annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 June 2019 (Case R 573/2019-3);

2.Dismisses the action brought by The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR in Case T-579/19;

3.Orders The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann GbR to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in both the present appeal and the proceedings at first instance;

4.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

Language of the case: German

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2566/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia