- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-204/23: Action brought on 19 April 2023 — Studiocanal v EUIPO — Leonine Distribution (ARTHAUS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0204
62023TN0204
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.5.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/43
(Case T-204/23)
(2023/C 189/57)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Studiocanal GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde and C. Zimmer, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Leonine Distribution GmbH (Munich, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark ‘ARTHAUS’ — EU trade mark No 6 988 984
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2023 in Case R 1533/2022-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it found the application for a declaration of invalidity to be admissible in the light of Article 59(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 63(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 12(1)(b) and Article 15(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430.