- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-647/22: Judgment of the General Court of 6 March 2024 – Puma v EUIPO – Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst (Shoe)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0647
62022TA0647
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2758
29.4.2024
(Case T-647/22)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community design representing a shoe - Disclosure of the prior design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
(C/2024/2758)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke and P. Trieb, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Handelsmaatschappij J. Van Hilst BV (Waalwijk, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Jonker and M. Roosendaal, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 11 August 2022 (Case R 726/2021-3).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Puma SE to pay the costs.
—
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 463, 5.12.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2758/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *