- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-562/24, Munik: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrožno sodišče v Kopru (Slovenia) lodged on 20 August 2024 – S.H. d.o.o., M.A. d.o.o.
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0562
62024CN0562
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/6915
25.11.2024
(Case C-562/24, Munik)
(C/2024/6915)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Other parties: S.H. d.o.o., M.A. d.o.o.
Question referred
Must Article 8(2)(d) of Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA and Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that even holders of judicial mortgages registered prior to the recognition of a decision of a court of another Member State or prior to the freezing of property for the purposes of execution are to be regarded as third parties whose rights must be taken into account in the proceedings for the execution of an order to confiscate property of unlawful origin?
—
(1) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6915/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
—