ORDER OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber)

18 April 2023 (*1)

(Rectification order)

In Case C‑74/22 P(I)-REC,

APPEAL under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, brought on 28 January 2022,

Soudal NV, established in Turnhout (Belgium),

Esko-Graphics BVBA, established in Ghent (Belgium),

represented by H. Viaene, advocaat,

appellants,

the other parties to the proceedings being:

Magnetrol International NV, established in Zele (Belgium),

applicant at first instance,

European Commission, represented by P.‑J. Loewenthal and F. Tomat, acting as Agents,

defendant at first instance,

THE COURT (Grand Chamber)

composed of K. Lenaerts, President, L. Bay Larsen (Rapporteur), Vice-President, A. Arabadjiev, C. Lycourgos, E. Regan, P.G. Xuereb and L.S. Rossi, Presidents of Chambers, M. Ilešič, N. Piçarra, I. Jarukaitis, A. Kumin, N. Jääskinen, N. Wahl, I. Ziemele and O. Spineanu-Matei, Judges,

Advocate General: M. Szpunar,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

after hearing the Advocate General,

makes the following

1On 1 August 2022, the Court (Grand Chamber) made the order in Soudal and Esko-Graphics v Magnetrol and Commission (C‑74/22 P(I), EU:C:2022:632).

2That order contains an error which it is appropriate to rectify of its own motion, pursuant to Article 154(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, which applies to the procedure on appeal pursuant to Article 190(1) of those rules.

On those grounds, the Court (Grand Chamber) hereby orders:

1.Paragraph 55 of the order of 1 August 2022, Soudal and Esko-Graphics v Magnetrol and Commission (C‑74/22 P(I), EU:C:2022:632), shall be rectified as follows:

‘The Commission recalls that the first paragraph of Article 57 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union provides that an appeal against a decision of the General Court dismissing an application to intervene must be brought within two weeks from the notification of the dismissal decision. If the present appeal were to be regarded as falling within the scope of that provision, given that the contested decision was notified to the appellants on 17 December 2021, the time limit within which it ought to have been brought expired on 10 January 2022. That appeal having been lodged on 28 January 2022, it must be dismissed as inadmissible.’

2.The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified order. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified order.

Luxembourg, 18 April 2023.

Registrar

President

ECLI:EU:C:2025:140

*1 Language of the case: English.