- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-385/18: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Arriva Italia Srl, Ferrotramviaria SpA, Consorzio Trasporti Aziende Pugliesi (CO.TRA.P) v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Notion — Public railway undertaking in difficulties — Aid measures — Allocation of financial aid — Aim — Continued operation of the public railway undertaking — Allocation to and shareholding in the capital of that public undertaking — Transfer to the capital of another public undertaking — Private investor test — Prior notification obligation for new aid)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0385
62018CA0385
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 68/9
(Case C-385/18) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Notion - Public railway undertaking in difficulties - Aid measures - Allocation of financial aid - Aim - Continued operation of the public railway undertaking - Allocation to and shareholding in the capital of that public undertaking - Transfer to the capital of another public undertaking - Private investor test - Prior notification obligation for new aid)
(2020/C 68/05)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Arriva Italia Srl, Ferrotramviaria SpA, Consorzio Trasporti Aziende Pugliesi (CO.TRA.P)
Defendant: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti
Joined parties: Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane SpA, Gestione Commissariale per le Ferrovie del Sud Est e Servizi Automobilistici Srl a socio unico, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 107 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that, subject to the verifications to be carried out by the referring court, both the allocation of a sum of money to a public undertaking in serious financial difficulties and the transfer of the entire shareholding of a Member State in the capital of that undertaking to another public undertaking, for no consideration but in exchange for an obligation on the part of the latter to remedy the asset imbalance of the former undertaking, can be classified as ‘State aid’ within the meaning of Article 107 TFEU.
2.EU law must be interpreted as meaning that, where measures such as the allocation of a sum of money to a public undertaking in serious financial difficulties or the transfer of the entire shareholding of a Member State in the capital of that undertaking to another public undertaking, for no consideration but in exchange for an obligation on the part of the latter to remedy the asset imbalance of the former, are classified as ‘State aid’ within the meaning of Article 107 TFEU, it is for the referring court to draw all the necessary inferences from the fact that the Commission was not notified of that aid, contrary to Article 108(3) TFEU, and that aid must therefore be regarded as being unlawful.
(1) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.