- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-264/17: Action brought on 4 May 2017 — Uponor Innovation v EUIPO — Swep International (SMATRIX)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0264
62017TN0264
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.7.2017
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 221/35
(Case T-264/17)
(2017/C 221/49)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Uponor Innovation AB (Borås, Sweden) (represented by: A. Kylhammar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Swep International AB (Landskrona, Sweden)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SMATRIX’ — Application for registration No 12 540 431
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2017 in Case R 236/2016-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs;
—order SWEP International to compensate the Applicant for the costs before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.