- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-634/18: Action brought on 23 October 2018 — Geske v EUIPO (revolutionary air pulse technology)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TN0634
62018TN0634
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.1.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 4/35
(Case T-634/18)
(2019/C 4/46)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: André Geske (Lübbecke, Germany) (represented by: R. Albrecht, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Mark at issue: Application for EU word mark revolutionary air pulse technology — Application for registration No 17 025 231
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 in Case R 2721/2017-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings before EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.