- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Joined Cases C-495/21 and C-496/21, Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Nasal drops) and Others: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 January 2023 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — L. GmbH (C-495/21), H. Ltd (C-496/21) v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Medical devices — Directive 93/42/EEC — Article 1(2)(a) — Definition — Article 1(5)(c) — Scope — Medicinal products for human use — Directive 2001/83/EC — Article 1(2) — Definition of the concept of ‘medicinal product’ — Article 2(2) — Applicable legal framework — Classification as a ‘medical device’ or as a ‘medicinal product’)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0495
62021CA0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 83/6
(Joined Cases C-495/21 and C-496/21, (1) Bundesrepublik Deutschland (Nasal drops) and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Medical devices - Directive 93/42/EEC - Article 1(2)(a) - Definition - Article 1(5)(c) - Scope - Medicinal products for human use - Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 1(2) - Definition of the concept of ‘medicinal product’ - Article 2(2) - Applicable legal framework - Classification as a ‘medical device’ or as a ‘medicinal product’)
(2023/C 83/07)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: L. GmbH (C-495/21), H. Ltd (C-496/21)
Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Operative part of the judgment
1.Article 2(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, must be interpreted as meaning that it applies not only to ‘medicinal products by function’, as referred to in Article 1(2)(b) of Directive 2001/83, as amended, but also to ‘medicinal products by presentation’, as referred to in Article 1(2)(a) of that directive.
2.Article 1(2)(a) of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices, as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007, and Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83, as amended by Directive 2004/27, must be interpreted as meaning that where the principal mode of action of a product is not scientifically established, that product cannot meet the definition of the concept of ‘medical device’, within the meaning of Directive 93/42, as amended by Directive 2007/47, or that of ‘medicinal product by function’, as referred to in Directive 2001/83, as amended by Directive 2004/27. It is for the national courts to assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether the conditions relating to the definition of the concept of ‘medicinal product by presentation’, as referred to in Directive 2001/83, as amended by Directive 2004/27, are satisfied.
(1) OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.