- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-359/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62006TA0359
62006TA0359
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.11.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 355/18
(Case T-359/06)(1)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Burden of proof - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence)
2012/C 355/34
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Heijmans Infrastructuur BV (Rosmalen, Netherlands) (represented initially by M. Smeets and A. Van den Oord, and subsequently by M. Smeets, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever)
Re:
Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Heijmans Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.