I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2009/C 256/58
Language of the case: Spanish
Applicant: Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de Valencia (Valencia, Spain) (represented by: E. Navarro Varona, lawyer)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
—annul, under Articles 230 and 231 EC, the Commission decision of 15 June 2009 partly denying access to information requested by the applicant by means of its initial application of 23 October 2008 and its confirmatory application of 19 January 2009.
—order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
This action is brought against the decision of the Commission of the European Communities partly refusing access to certain documents drawn up by the consultants ECORYS Nederland BV for the preparation of the report titled ‘Study of regulatory restrictions in the field of pharmacies’ of 22 June 2007 for the defendant’s Directorate General Internal Market and Services.
In support of its claims, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 4(2) and Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. (<span class="super">1</span>)
The applicant claims that the contested decision:
—does not contain an adequate statement of reasons.
—errs in its assessment of the exception relating to the commercial interests of a legal person, including intellectual property.
—contains a manifest error of reasoning, by not taking into account that there is an overriding public interest.
—Fails to comply with the prescribed periods for replying to the confirmatory application for access to the documents.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark; OJ L 145 of 31.5.2001, p. 43