Official Journal of the European Union

C series

—

C/2025/2234

22.4.2025

(Case T-175/25)

(C/2025/2234)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: IC (represented by: L. Levi and M. Itani, lawyers)

Defendants: European Parliament and European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—declare the present action to be admissible and well-founded;

—annul the decisions set out, first, in an email of 5 July 2024 from the Head of the Payroll Unit of the European Parliament deciding not to carry out a retroactive correction of annual travel expenses based on the distance between her place of employment and her place of origin in Mississauga (Canada) in respect of the years 2014 and 2015, and, second, in the pay slip for June 2024 drawn up by the European Commission determining annual travel expenses based on the distance between her place of employment and her place of origin in Mississauga (Canada) only as from 2024 and not also in respect of the years 2014 to 2023;

—in so far as is necessary, annul the two decisions of 2 December 2024 and 20 December 2024 rejecting the complaints;

—order the defendants to reimburse the applicant’s annual travel expenses based on the distance between her place of employment and her place of origin in respect of the years 2014 and 2015 and 2022 and 2023, that amount to be increased by default interest at the rate set by the European Central Bank for main refinancing operations;

—order the defendants to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law which are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-136/25, HV v EESC.

—

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2234/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

—