- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-495/18: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Dermatest v EUIPO (DERMATEST) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark DERMATEST — Refusal of registration — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0495
62018TB0495
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.6.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 213/37
(Case T-495/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark DERMATEST - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 213/38)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek, D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 426/2018-4), relating to an application for registration of the word sign DERMATEST as an EU trade mark
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
OJ C 352, 1.10.2018