- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-48/16: Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2018 — Sigma Orionis v Commission (Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2007-2013) and ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ — Suspension of payments and termination of grant contracts following a financial audit — Action seeking to obtain payment of the amounts owed by the Commission in the context of the implementation of the grant contracts — Non-contractual liability)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0048
62016TA0048
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-48/16) (*1)
‛(Arbitration clause — Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2007-2013) and ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ — Suspension of payments and termination of grant contracts following a financial audit — Action seeking to obtain payment of the amounts owed by the Commission in the context of the implementation of the grant contracts — Non-contractual liability)’
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Sigma Orionis SA (Valbonne, France) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)
Re:
First, an action under Article 272 TFEU seeking an order directing the Commission to pay to the applicant the amounts owed pursuant to contracts concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (2007-2013) and ‘Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation’ and, second, an action under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the breach by the Commission of its obligations.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Sigma Orionis SA to pay the costs, including those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
*
(*1) OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.