- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-222/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tartu Ringkonnakohus (Estonia) lodged on 11 May 2012 — A. Karuse AS v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012CN0222
62012CN0222
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.7.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 209/5
(Case C-222/12)
2012/C 209/08
Language of the case: Estonian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: A. Karuse AS
Defendant: Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet
Question referred
Must the expression ‘in connection with road maintenance’ used in the definition of the exception permitted in Article 13(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) be interpreted as covering a tipping lorry with a laden weight of 25.5 tonnes carrying gravel along a public highway from a quarry to a site of road improvement and maintenance works?
(1) Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, OJ 2006 L 102, p. 1.