I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 178/23)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicants: Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise e.V. (Veitsbronn, Deutschland) (represented by: B. Bittner, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Appeal Board: Freistaat Bayern (Munich, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘NEUSCHWANSTEIN’
Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 28/2014-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—declare the sign ‘NEUSCHWANSTEIN’ — Community trade mark No 10 144 392 — invalid;
—order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.