- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-476/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Commission v Moschonaki (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Notice of vacancy — Rejection of application — Action for annulment — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Admissibility — Rule that the application corresponds to the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials — Action for damages)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0476
62011TA0476
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 359/8
(Case T-476/11 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Notice of vacancy - Rejection of application - Action for annulment - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Rule that the application corresponds to the complaint - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials - Action for damages)
2013/C 359/12
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings: Chrysanthe Moschonaki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the appellant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: T. Kennedy and I. Ní Riagáin Düro, Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 in Case F-55/10 AS v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 in Case F-55/10 AS v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), in so far as it declares the plea in law alleging infringement of Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union to be admissible, in so far as it annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 whereby the European Commission rejected Ms Chrysanthe Moschonaki’s application on the basis of that plea in law, and in so far as it ordered the Commission to pay Ms Moschonaki the sum of EUR 3 000;
2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;
3.Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;
4.Reserves the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 319, 29.10.2011.