I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-667/18) ( (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>))
(Civil service - Rights and obligations of officials - Declaration of intention to engage in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Article 16 of the Staff Regulations - Risk of incompatibility with the legitimate interests of the institution - Deadline for responding to the declaration of intention - Implicit acceptance - Prohibition on engaging in an occupational activity after leaving the service - Non-material damage)
(2020/C 36/33)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: José Manuel Pinto Teixeira (Oeiras, Portugal) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)
Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the EEAS of 21 February 2018 prohibiting the applicant from engaging in an outside activity pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and, secondly, compensation for the damage that the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of that decision.
1)The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 21 February 2018 prohibiting Mr José Manuel Pinto Teixeira from engaging in an outside activity, pursuant to Article 16 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, is annulled.
2)The action is dismissed as to the remainder.
3)Each party shall pay its own costs.
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2020036EN.01002702-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2020036EN.01002702-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> </span> ) OJ C 16, 14.1.2019.