I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 370/42
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l’information (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 July 2011 in Case R 370/2011-2;
—Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before OHIM and in the present case
Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘EURO AUTOMATIC PAIEMENT’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 37, 38, 42 and 45
Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 in so far as the mark submitted for registration is not descriptive.