EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-485/23 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 June 2025 – enercity v Commission (Appeal – Competition – Concentrations – Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market – Action brought by a third party – Admissibility – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Locus standi)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0485

62023CA0485

June 26, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4428

18.8.2025

(Case C-485/23 P)

(Appeal - Competition - Concentrations - Decision declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market - Action brought by a third party - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Locus standi)

(C/2025/4428)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: enercity AG (represented by: C. Schalast, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Meessen and I. Zaloguin, acting as Agents, and by F.C. Haus and J. Mädler, Rechtsanwälte), Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: J. Möller and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents), E.ON SE (represented initially by C. Barth, C. Grave, D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves and R. Seifert, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by C. Barth, A. Fuchs, C. Grave and D.-J. dos Santos Gonçalves, Rechtsanwälte), RWE AG (represented initially by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and J. Ziebarth, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by U. Scholz, J. Siegmund and M. von Armansperg, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 17 May 2023, enercity v Commission (T-321/20, EU:T:2023:253);

Dismisses the action brought by enercity AG for annulment of Commission Decision C(2019) 1711 final of 26 February 2019, declaring a concentration compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement (Case M.8871 – RWE/E.ON Assets) as inadmissible;

Orders enercity AG, E.ON SE, RWE AG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in relation to the proceedings at first instance and to the appeal proceedings;

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.

(1) OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4428/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia