- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-718/14: Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Hong Kong Group v OHIM — WE Brand (W E)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0718
62014TN0718
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 431/41
(Case T-718/14)
(2014/C 431/65)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Hong Kong Group Oy (Vantaa, Finland) (represented by: J. Spåre, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: WE Brand Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark including the word element ‘W E’ — Application for registration No 1 0 7 63 795
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 August 2014 in Case R 2305/2013-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and uphold the application for a Community trade mark registration lodged by the applicant;
—order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1) (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.