- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-690/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Efetio Thrakis (Greece) lodged on 27 December 2013 — Trapeza Eurobank Ergasias A.E. v Agrotiki Trapeza tis Ellados (A.T.E.), Pavlos Sidiropoulos
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0690
62013CN0690
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.3.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/5
(Case C-690/13)
2014/C 78/09
Language of the case: Greek
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Trapeza Eurobank Ergasias A.E.
Respondents: Agrotiki Trapeza tis Ellados (A.T.E.), Pavlos Sidiropoulos
Questions referred
1.Do the substantive and procedural privileges conferred upon ‘A.T.E. A.E.’ by Articles 12 and 13(1) of Law 4332/1929, in conjunction with Article 26(1) of Law 1914/1990, fall within the scope of Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?
(b)Does the same restriction apply even if it is assumed that ‘A.T.E. A.E.’ continues to engage in activity of ‘public benefit’ under its statutes?
2.If the answers to questions ‘1.a’ and ‘1.b’ are in the affirmative, should Greece have observed the procedure prescribed by Article 108(3) of that Treaty in order for the privileges in question to remain into force?
3.In the instance in question, must this court not apply Articles 12 and 13(1) of Law 4332/1929 inasmuch as they may be contrary to Articles 107(1) and 108(3) TFEU?