- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-718/16: Action brought on 4 October 2016 — Mad Dogg Athletics v EUIPO — Aerospinning Master Franchising (SPINNING)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0718
62016TN0718
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
12.12.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 462/30
(Case T-718/16)
(2016/C 462/39)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. (Venice, California, United States of America) (represented by: J. Steinberg, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aerospinning Master Franchising Ltd. s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘SPINNING’ — EU trade mark No 175 117
Procedure before EUIPO: Revocation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 in Case R 2375/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it revoked EU work mark No 000175117 ‘SPINNING’ for the goods ‘exercise equipment’ in Class 28 and the services ‘exercise training’ in Class 41;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 41(2)(a) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
—Infringement of Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.