EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-433/15: Action brought on 27 July 2015 — Bank Saderat v Conseil

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0433

62015TN0433

July 27, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/40

(Case T-433/15)

(2015/C 320/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bank Saderat plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Jeffrey, S. Ashley and A. Irvine, Solicitors, and M-E. Demetriou and R. Blakeley, Barristers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

condemn the Council to pay the following sums to the applicant:

€ 8 8 9 06 191 in respect of material damage up until the date of this claim;

€ 8 7 13 285 in respect of interest on the sum in sub-paragraph (1) above plus daily interest of € 10 377 until the date of judgment, in the alternative at the European Central Bank main refinancing rate + 2 % per annum until the date of judgment, in the further alternative at such rate and for such period as the Court thinks fit;

a daily rate of € 54 716 in respect of material damage from the date of this claim until the end of the Claim Period;

interest on the total sum calculated pursuant to sub-paragraph (3) above at the rate of 4,2601 % per annum until the date of judgment, in the alternative at the European Central Bank main refinancing rate + 2 % per annum until the date of judgment, in the further alternative at such rate and for such period as the Court thinks fit;

€ 3 2 9 64 320 in respect of material damage from the date of the end of the Claim Period;

€ 1 0 00 000 in respect of non-material damage;

post-judgment interest on the sums in sub-paragraphs (1) to (6) above at the rate of 4,2601 % per annum until the date of payment, in the alternative at the European Central Bank main refinancing rate + 2 % per annum until the date of payment, in the further alternative at such rate and for such period as the Court thinks fit; and

the Bank’s costs of this application;

condemn the Council to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant puts forward that the EU Council’s imposition of restrictive measures on the applicant was a sufficiently serious breach of obligations intended to confer rights upon the applicant and accordingly the non-contractual liability of the EU is engaged.

According to the applicant, this breach was the direct cause of significant material and non-material harm to the applicant for which it is entitled to compensation.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia