EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-600/23: Action brought on 28 September 2023 — BNetzA v ACER

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0600

62023TN0600

September 28, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/674

13.11.2023

(Case T-600/23)

(C/2023/674)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNetzA) (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein and K. Reiter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators of 7 July 2023 (A-003-2019_R), confirming decision No 2/2019 of 21 February 2019 of the Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators on the Core CCR TSO’s proposals for the regional design of the day-ahead and intraday common capacity calculation methodologies;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on one plea in law, alleging that the Board of Appeal erred in law by confirming the mechanism imposed by common coordinated capacity calculation methodologies. That mechanism is unlawful, since it makes it impossible or, at least more difficult than provided by the law, to apply capacity calculation to internal network elements. This is contrary to Articles 14 to 16 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222, (2) as a literal, historical, systematic and purposive readings show. An interpretation of Articles 14 to 16 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943 in the light of EU primary law confirms this result.

(1) Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity (OJ 2019 L 158, p. 54).

(2) Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 of 24 July 2015 establishing a guideline on capacity allocation and congestion management (OJ 2015 L 197, p. 24).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/674/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia