- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-287/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Heitkamp BauHolding v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning loss carry-forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market — Action for annulment — Individual concern — Admissibility — Concept of State aid — Selectivity — Nature and general scheme of the tax system)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TA0287
62011TA0287
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.3.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 98/27
(Case T-287/11) (1)
((State aid - German tax legislation concerning loss carry-forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Individual concern - Admissibility - Concept of State aid - Selectivity - Nature and general scheme of the tax system))
(2016/C 098/34)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Heitkamp BauHolding GmbH (Herne, Germany) (represented initially by W. Niemann, M. Kiera-Nöllen and S. Geringhoff, and subsequently by W. Niemann, S. Geringhoff and P. Dodos, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, and subsequently by R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and C. Egerer, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Rejects the objection of inadmissibility;
2.Dismisses the action as unfounded;
3.Orders Heitkamp BauHolding GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the European Commission’s costs, and orders the Commission to bear one third of its own costs;
4.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs.
(1) OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.