I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-764/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Medical devices - Directive 93/42/EEC - Expiry of the validity of certificates for medical devices issued under the mutual recognition agreement by bodies established in Switzerland - Amendment of the entry in the online database of the NANDO information system corresponding to the conformity assessment body for medical devices which had issued the certificates - Act not open to challenge - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 252/57)
Language of the case: English
Applicants: Atesos medical AG (Aarau, Switzerland) and the 7 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the order (represented by: M. Meulenbelt and S. De Knop, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Sanfrutos Cano, C. Vollrath and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)
By their action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of a European Commission decision stating that the designation of ‘Schweizerische Vereinigung für Qualitäts- und Management Systeme’ as a conformity assessment body for medical devices under Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices (OJ 1993 L 169, p. 1) had expired, and amending SQS’s entry in the database of notified and designated bodies, with effect from 28 September 2021.
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Atesos medical AG, Bonebridge AG, Heico-Switzerland AG, Keri Medical SA, Medcem GmbH, MPS Precimed SA, PX Dental SA and Stemcup Medical Products AG shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for interim relief.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 95, 28.2.2022.