- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-888/24, Adão da Fonseca-Engenheiros Consultores: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 20 December 2024 – Adão da Fonseca – Engenheiros Consultores, Lda v Metro do Porto, S.A., Betar Consultores, Lda
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0888
62024CN0888
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2839
(Case C-888/24, Adão da Fonseca-Engenheiros Consultores)
(C/2025/2839)
Language of the case: Portuguese
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Adão da Fonseca – Engenheiros Consultores, Lda.
Defendants:
Question referred
Should the rule requiring anonymity of candidates laid down in Article 82(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU, (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) in conjunction with the possibility of dialogue between the jury and the candidates in order to obtain clarification about the designs submitted, as provided for in Article 82(5) and (6), and with the reference in Article 80(1) of that directive to the provisions of Title I, be interpreted as precluding a prior hearing of the interested parties as a compulsory step in the procedure?
—
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2839/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—