EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-661/22: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2023 — Claro v EUIPO — Claranet Europe (Claro) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Claro — Earlier EU word mark CLARANET — Relative ground for invalidity — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0661

62022TA0661

November 29, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/950

(Case T-661/22) (*)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark Claro - Earlier EU word mark CLARANET - Relative ground for invalidity - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(C/2024/950)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Claro SA (São Paulo, Brazil) (represented by: J. Ferreira Sardinha, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Claranet Europe Ltd (Saint Helier, Jersey) (represented by: M. Forde, Solicitor)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks, in essence, the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 August 2022 (Case R 1674/2021-5).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders Claro SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Claranet Europe Ltd;

3.Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

*

Language of the case: English.

ECLI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/950/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/950/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia