- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-137/19: Action brought on 28 February 2019 — Souruh v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0137
62019TN0137
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.4.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 148/58
(Case T-137/19)
(2019/C 148/57)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Souruh SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;
—as a consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation for all the harm suffered by the applicant at an amount to be determined by the Court on an equitable basis;
—in the alternative, order an expert to be appointed in order to establish the total extent of the harm suffered by the applicant;
—order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a principal plea and an alternative plea, which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-55/19, Cham Holding and Bena Properties v Council.