I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C/2024/3485)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG (Münster, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, D. Mienert, J. Selbmann and K. Uzman, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Moviescreens Rental GmbH (Damme, Germany)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Klägerin
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark AIRSCREEN – EU trade mark No 3 244 662
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 February 2024 in Case R 1809/2022-1
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it revoked EU trade mark No 3 244 662;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3485/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—