I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(Action for annulment - Request to initiate an investigation - Refusal by EIOPA - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility)
(C/2025/3054)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Evroins inshurans grup AD (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: H. Drăghici, A. Morogai and F. Giurgea, lawyers)
Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (represented by: S. Rosenbaum and S. Dispiter, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, Z. Mzee and F. Boos, lawyers)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the letter of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) of 19 September 2023, bearing reference EIOPA-23-719 on the initiation of an investigation under Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority [(EIOPA)], amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/79/EC (OJ 2010 L 331, p. 48).
The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
Evroins inshurans grup AD shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA).
—
(1)
OJ C C/2024/1100, 5.2.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3054/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—