I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-527/16) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Civil Service - Reform of the Staff Regulations and of the CEOS that entered into force on 1 January 2014 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Solidarity levy applicable from 1 January 2014 - Suspension of application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014)
(2020/C 36/28)
Language of the case: French
Applicant: Margarita Tàpias (Wavre, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision fixing the applicant’s remuneration for January 2014, as given specific expression in the salary slip for that month sent to her on 14 January 2014, which is the first salary slip to apply, with regard to the applicant, Article 65(4) and Article 66a of the Staff Regulations stemming from Article 1(44) and (46) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p.15) providing, respectively, for the suspension of the application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014 and the introduction of a solidarity levy from 1 January 2014.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Margarita Tàpias to pay the costs;
3.Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 7, 12.1.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-121/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).