- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-542/09: Action brought on 18 December 2009 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009CN0542
62009CN0542
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2010
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 63/31
(Case C-542/09)
2010/C 63/50
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)
Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands
Form of order sought
—Declare that, by requiring that migrant workers and family members for whom they still provide must fulfil a residence requirement (the ‘3 out of 6 rule’) in order to be eligible under the WSF (1) for the funding of educational studies abroad, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 45 TFEU and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68; (2)
—order Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
As the Netherlands has still not adopted all the measures necessary to put an end to the residence requirement (the ‘3 out of 6 rule’), which migrant workers and family members for whom they still provide must fulfil in order to be eligible under the WSF for the funding of educational studies abroad, the Commission draws the conclusion that the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 45 TFEU and Regulation No 1612/68.
(1) Wet Studiefinanciering 2000 (Law on funding for studies).
(2) Council Regulation of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ L 257, p. 2).