- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-57/17: Action brought on 31 January 2017 — Pegasus v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0057
62017TN0057
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.3.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 78/42
(Case T-57/17)
(2017/C 078/57)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Article I.4.1 of the defendant’s decision of 12 December 2016 (Reference: FINS-2017-31) concerning the reduction of the pre-financing amount to 33 % of the specified maximum amount and ordering that a guarantee be lodged;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, which is in essence identical or similar to that raised in Case T-54/17, CLF v Parliament.