- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-325/22: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2023 — Nurel v EUIPO — FKuR Property (Terylene) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Terylene — Earlier EU word mark TERRALENE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Proof of genuine use)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0325
62022TA0325
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 329/23
(Case T-325/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Terylene - Earlier EU word mark TERRALENE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Proof of genuine use)
(2023/C 329/33)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Nurel, SA (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Anadón Giménez and J. Learte Álvarez, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: FKuR Property GmbH (Willich, Germany) (represented by H. Timmann, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 30 March 2022 (Case R 1544/2021-4)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nurel, SA to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 284, 25.7.2022.