EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-46/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-316/14: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CN0046

62019CN0046

January 25, 2019
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/17

(Case C-46/19 P)

(2019/C 103/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, S. Van Overmeire, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), European Commission, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

set aside the contested judgment of the General Court;

give final judgment in the matters that are the subject of this appeal and to dismiss PKK's application; and

order the PKK to pay the costs of the Council arising from the present appeal and from Case T-316/14.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Council submits that the General Court erred in the contested judgment on the following points:

first plea: the General Court wrongly characterised the contested decisions as purely Article 1(6) decisions (1);

second plea: the General Court wrongly concluded that the U.S. decisions cannot serve as a basis for the initial listing;

third plea: the General Court wrongly found that the Council had failed to explain why it considered the U.S. decisions and the Order of the UK Home Secretary to be a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of CP931;

fourth plea: the General Court wrongly applied the Court of Justice's LTTE (2) judgment, point 55, to the case at hand;

fifth plea: the General Court wrongly applied LTTE, point 71 to the case at hand;

sixth plea: the General Court wrongly applied Article 1(4) of CP931 and point 55 of the LTTE judgment;

seventh plea: the General Court wrongly held that the Council could not respond to the PKK's letter in its own letter of 27 March 2015.

*

(1) Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001, L 344, p. 93).

(2) Case C-599/14 P, Council v. LTTE, EU:C2017:583

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia