- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-754/22 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 – OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission (Appeal – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 – Regulation (EU) 2021/953 – EU Digital COVID Certificate – Freedom of movement of persons – Restrictions – Action for annulment – Inadmissibility – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Appeal manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0754
62022CB0754
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2024/2402
Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 January 2024 — OG, OH, OI, OJ v European Commission
(Case C-754/22 P) (*)
(Appeal - Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2288 and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/503 - Regulation (EU) 2021/953 - EU Digital COVID Certificate - Freedom of movement of persons - Restrictions - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded)
(C/2024/2402)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Appellants: OG, OH, OI, OJ (represented by: D. Gómez Fernández, abogado)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and E. Montaguti, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed as manifestly unfounded.
2.OG, OH, OI and OJ shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
—
(*)
OJ C 94, 13.3.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2402/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Spanish