- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-538/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Guasch Pubill v EUIPO — Nap-Kings (Table linen) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing table linen — Disclosure of earlier design — Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0538
62020TA0538
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 24/32
(Case T-538/20) (*)
(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing table linen - Disclosure of earlier design - Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity - Article 52(3) of Regulation No 6/2002)
(2022/C 24/41)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Marcos Guasch Pubill (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Guerras Mazón and M. Centell Ribas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nap-Kings, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Otero Iglesias, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 June 2020 (Case R 1051/2019-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Nap-Kings and Mr Guasch Pubill.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Marcos Guasch Pubill to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: Spanish.