- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-679/19: Action brought on 4 October 2019 — Argyraki v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0679
62019TN0679
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.11.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/100
(Case T-679/19)
(2019/C 399/118)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Vassilia Argyraki (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the decision of 30 November 2018 taken by the PMO concerning the way in which pension rights are to be calculated, and, in general, the application of the provisions of the Staff Regulations on pension rights in respect of the applicant when she retires;
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action challenging the abovementioned decision of the European Commission’s Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO), the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging failure to comply with the guidance set out in Torné (judgment of 14 December 2018, Torné v Commission, T-128/17, EU:T:2018:969);
2.Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 21 and 22 of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;
3.Third plea in law, alleging unequal treatment.