- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-478/13: Order of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0478
62013TB0478
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.9.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 339/18
(Case T-478/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
2014/C 339/21
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain) (represented by: C. Giner Mas and R. Rodriguez Zaragoza, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2013 (Case R 1000/2012-5), relating to opposition proceedings between NumberFour AG and Inaer Helicópteros, SA
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The applicant and intervener shall bear their own costs and each shall pay one half of the costs borne by the defendant.
(1)
OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.