- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-105/07: Order of the General Court of 3 March 2010 — MarketTools v OHIM — Optimus-Telecomunicações (ZOOMERANG) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0105
62007TB0105
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
22.5.2010
Official Journal of the European Union
C 134/34
(Case T-105/07)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
2010/C 134/57
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MarketTools, Inc. (San Francisco, United States) (represented by: W. von der Osten-Sacken, A. González Hähnlein, O. Günzel and A. Wenninger, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: initially S. Laitinen, subsequently G. Schneider and D. Botis, Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA (Maia, Portugal) (represented by: T. Colaço Dias and J. Conceição Pimenta, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2007 (Case R 253/2006-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Optimus-Telecomunicações, SA and MarketTools, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to rule on the action.
2.The applicant shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the defendant.
3.The intervener shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.