EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-507/23, Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 8 August 2023 — A v Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0507

62023CN0507

August 8, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/125

16.10.2023

(Case C-507/23, Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs)

(C/2023/125)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant at first instance and appellant:

Defendant at first instance and respondent:

Questions referred

1.Must Article 82(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation (1) be interpreted as meaning that the unlawful processing of personal data, in so far as it is an infringement of that regulation, may, in itself, constitute unjustified interference with a person’s subjective right to the protection of his or her data and damage caused to that person?

2.Must Article 82(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation be interpreted as meaning that, where there is no possibility of restoring the situation that existed before the damage was caused, it permits the imposition of the obligation to apologise as the sole form of compensation for non-material damage?

3.Must Article 82(1) of the General Data Protection Regulation be interpreted as meaning that it permits a smaller amount of compensation for the damage caused to be set on the basis of circumstances that are indicative of the attitude and motivation of the person processing the data (for example, the need to perform a task carried out in the public interest, the lack of intent to cause damage to the person concerned or difficulties in understanding the legal framework)?

Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/125/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: Latvian.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia