EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-226/14: Action brought on 15 April 2014 — Commission v McCarron Poultry

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0226

62014TN0226

April 15, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/34

(Case T-226/14)

2014/C 212/44

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Van der Hout, lawyer, and L. Cappelletti and F. Moro, agents)

Defendant: McCarron Poultry Ltd (Killacorn Emyvale, Ireland)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum due of EUR 9 76 663,34, corresponding to the principal amount of EUR 9 00 662,25 plus the amount of EUR 76 001,09 as late payment interest calculated at a rate of 2,50 % for the period between 01.12.2010 and 15.04.2014;

Order the defendant to pay the European Commission the sum of EUR 61,690 per day by way of interest from 16.04.2014 until the date on which the debt is repaid in full; and

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present application is presented under Article 272 TFEU seeking a decision of the General Court ordering the defendant to reimburse the European Commission the principal amount of EUR 9 00 662,25, plus interest, in relation to contract No NNE5/1999/20229 for ‘Community Activities in the Field of the specific programme for RTD and demonstration on “Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development — Part B: Energy program”’.

In support of its application, the European Commission raises a single plea in law: the Commission contends that the defendant has breached its contractual obligations by failing to reimburse to the Commission the difference between the Union's financial contribution due to defendant and the total amount of funding already received by it. The financial contribution due to the defendant is less than the total amount paid by the applicant by means of advance and intermediate payments. The Commission contends therefore that, under the contract, the defendant is liable for the sum due.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia