I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
9.10.2023
(C/2023/37)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG (Hanau, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Welco spol. s.r.o. (Uherský Brod, Czech Republic)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark WELCO — EU mark No 17 439 969
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 June 2023 in Case R 2409/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—grant the applicant leave to replace the original party, Heraeus Deutschland GmbH, now Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KG, pursuant to Article 174 of the Rules of Procedure;
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred as a result of the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(a) and Article 8(2)(a)(i) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.