I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2012/C 355/76
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Sport Eybl & Sports Experts GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: B. Gumpoldsberger, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elite Licensing Company SA (Fribourg, Switzerland)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the part of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 June 2012 in Case R 881/2011-1 with which the opponent’s appeal was upheld and the registration of the Community trade mark applied for by the applicant in respect of Classes 9, 12, 18, 22, 25 and 28 was refused; and
—order the defendant to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the letter ‘e’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 12, 18, 22, 25, 28 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 6 220 421
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Elite Licensing Company SA
Mark or sign cited in opposition: the national, international and Community figurative mark including the letter ‘e’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 32, 35, 38, 41, 43 and 44
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected
Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was upheld in part
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009