- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-381/16: Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Düll v EUIPO — Cognitect (DaToMo) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for revocation — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0381
62016TB0381
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.6.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 195/28
(Case T-381/16)(1)
((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for revocation - No need to adjudicate))
(2017/C 195/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Klaus Düll (Südergellersen, Germany) (represented by: S. Wolff-Marting, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cognitect, Inc. (Durham, North Carolina, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1383/2015-2 and R 1481/2015-2), concerning cancellation proceedings between Cognitect, Inc. and Klaus Düll.
Operative part of the order
1)There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2)Klaus Düll and Cognitect, Inc. shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(1) OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.